There is a fuller answer over on stackexchange. Will your colours look more accurate? They might look the same when they come out as when they went in, but you’ll be viewing them on the same monitor. That’s not to say ACES isn’t a very good thing or won’t do any good, it will do a really good job at helping with the things it can help with, and maybe one day it will be the default setting. Rendering to ACES, on it’s own, isn’t a button that will make a ‘better’ render. jpg textures you would be kind of missing the point. The short answer is if you’re not doing data transforms from different input devices you might not need ACES, and if you’re looking for ways to set colour spaces for rendering. On the other hand, we might not have had Filmic without ACES having been developed soooo. The down side of ACES is that it doesn’t do gamut mapping, so renders won’t necessarily match output made with Filmic enabled. ![]() ![]() ![]() So using ACES won’t create any new, better data, it just might help you lose less by keeping your data scene referred.ĪCES was created more for combining film and video, however cg data has been included from the start since cgi is such a large part of film making. The idea behind ACES is to be able to convert output from a large number of different camera formats to a single, very large colour space without data loss or distortion. ![]() You could write book in reply to seemingly simple questions like these, so this isn’t a very full answer.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |